The Wolf of Wall Street, Killing Them Softly

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)

• Martin Scorsese's latest is outrageously entertaining.  Over the daunting (but typical for the director) runtime of about 3 hours, the viewer is bombarded by one surprising, shocking, usually illegal action after the next.  By the time you've reacted to one outrageous scene, we're already halfway into the next.  The pacing is lightning fast and the dialogue ricochets along with it.  It's dynamic and impressive work.  Viewers will have one of two reactions: 1) laughter the ridiculousness of the characters' actions and that any of this behavior is remotely based on actual events or 2) complete and utter disgust.  You'll know within the first minutes of the film.  Scorsese throws you into the world of the film and doesn't let up.  Leonardo DiCaprio gives another incredible performance, one that draws comparisons to his other roles (i.e. con man Frank Abagnale in Catch Me If You Can and his title role as The Great Gatsby).  If you've seen the trailer, you know what tone to expect for the film.  You could never predict the film itself.  DiCaprio has stated "we're not condoning this behavior, we're indicting it."  But they sure are having fun doing it.
• Rating: 5 out of 5

Killing Them Softly (2012)

• Andrew Dominik's crime thriller comes across as a heavy-handed, un-engaging indictment of capitalism.  Its heart is in the right place, but its ideals are forced into the plot via various political interviews and press conferences of Presidents Bush and Obama.  I watched a behind-the-scenes special in which Dominik said the film's message was for "crime not to be glamorous, but that it's a job and kind of a drag."  That works, in theory.  But when you have an extended, beautifully filmed slow-motion sequence of a character being shot multiple times as bullet casings grace against rain droplets, that statement becomes a bit hypocritical.  Brad Pitt and Scoot McNairy shine in their respective roles and serve the film well.  Unfortunately, the James Gandolfini character (which the film seems obsessed with given his amount of screen time) was exceedingly boring and more of a cliche than a truly developed character.  Killing Them Softly had the potential to be a unique crime thriller with brains to match its brawn all within a lean runtime of 98 minutes.  However, the end result is a mixed bag that drags along, never really satisfies its ambitious goals, and denies the casual viewer very many action sequences.
• Rating: 2.5 out of 5

Sources for Above Images:

TWOWS: http://www.nerdist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/wows2.gif

KTS: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiCgitvuOzQnfJaFLz3E_urc_HCgLA7vG0bXSMn3Zcwz5UMjcDk04X9XbBOmGuMIkXpokGMYnMeHmW82YcTPRUbL2XryL-W0zbZfKO7rSUo8Fi5Z0EPXAAd-58ackK2JxepribndxGN9iY/s1600/killingthemsoftly.jpg

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, Dallas Buyers Club, Frozen

The Secret Life of Walter Mitty

• The critics got it wrong with this one.  Currently sitting at 47% on Rotten Tomatoes, Walter Mitty deserves higher praise than it seems to be getting.  The film is gorgeously shot and scored, featuring song choices that perfectly accompany the visuals.  It's what my sister would (accurately) call "a life movie."  Ben Stiller (who also directed the film) portrays the title character with honesty and subtlety, but effectively.  Walter Mitty finds just the right balance of laughs, emotions, poignancy, and surprise.  And it's only rated PG!  This is the type of film I suspect that the late critic Roger Ebert would have championed.  Walter Mitty dreams big and has a great imagination, showcasing a love for life itself.
• Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Dallas Buyers Club

• Matthew McConaughey leads the fight against pharmaceutical companies, the DEA, close-minded physicians, and anyone else who stands in his way to find a way to beat AIDS.  The performance is phenomenal.  His character (based on a real person) transforms from a frustrating state of numb apathy and drug-filled risk behavior to a take charge leader in the fight against AIDS.  Fittingly, we see the self-proclaimed cowboy getting "back on the horse" at the end of the film, back in take-control-of-my-life fashion.  The film is inspiring on several occasions and never fails to engage.  McConaughey is helped by a slew of adept supporting characters, notably Jared Leto and Jennifer Garner.  With the help of clever direction (i.e. the shot of what seems to be vocation candles, pulls back to reveal they're candles at a strip club) and a brilliant screenplay, Dallas Buyers Club is a "based on a true story" film done right.
• Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Frozen

• Frozen represents old-school storytelling in new-school clothes (i.e. stunning digital animation).  It's a classic story of sisters torn apart, true love, and a town caught in the middle.  Frozen has already gained well-earned praise for its memorable soundtrack.   It's fun, familiar, and family-oriented entertainment.  Frozen is thoroughly enjoyable.
• 3D: I saw the film in 3D, and my initial reaction was that it didn't add much to the story.  The real value of seeing the film in 3D would be for the short film played before Frozen, which was absolutely genius (it blends classic Mickey Mouse cartoons with the latest 3D innovations).
• Stick around: There's a scene after the credits.
• Rating: 4 out of 5 (the short film before the feature gets 5 out of 5!)

Sources for Above Images:

TSLOWM: http://www.daveonfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/walter-mitty-publicity-still-photo.jpg

DBC: http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/i/2013/09/09/DALLAS-BUYERS-CLUB.jpg

FROZEN:http://static2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131103205461/disney/images/6/66/Frozen_castposter.jpg

American Hustle, The Hunger Games 2: Catching Fire, A Madea Christmas

American Hustle

• WOW.  Just great from start to finish.  I love the nostalgia.  I love the absurdity.  I love ALL of the actors.  And I love the director.  This is a thoroughly entertaining film that succeeds at being both flat out hilarious and gripping, often at the same time.  The great movies about con artists are often clever because the characters in them are clever.  The plot really depends on the characters being actualized and fully developed.  Director David O. Russell has proven time and time again that he can craft amazing, character-driven films, and he has succeeded once again.  There's no question that this one will be garnering some well deserved attention at upcoming award shows.  Even if it doesn't, it makes it onto my list of top films of the year.  
• Rating: 5 out of 5

THG2:CF

• The first of the Hunger Games sequels amps up the psychological elements, maintains thrilling set pieces, and continues upon the first installment's smart direction and elaborate costuming.  This is one of those few, cherished occasions in which the sequel surpasses the original.  I'm hoping the trend continues, because word on the street is that the 3rd and final novel is decidedly lackluster.  This will hopefully be corrected for in the final film(s).  In Catching Fire, the threats young Catniss must face become more immediate and her actions more crucial.  As the title implies, this is a story that's meant to be a midpoint between an introduction and finale.  That being said, it still has enough chops to stand on its own as a satisfying middle man.  The ending is unexpectedly abrupt (not a bad thing), and by the end of it, it's fair to say the fire has started.  Catching Fire makes for an riveting trip to the movies and succeeds at pumping you up for the sure-to-be exciting finale.
• Rating: 4.5 out of 5

A Madea Christmas

• Just kidding.  I didn't see this - YET!
• Rating: ?? out of ??????????

Sources for Above Images:

AH: http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/51fd708cecad04f144000041-1200-706/american-hustle.jpg

THG2CF: http://flavorwire.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/catching-fire3.jpg