Saturday, July 15, 2017

Summer 2017 at the movies

Enjoy!


Baby Driver
  • Review: 5/5
  • A wholly unique cinematic experience.  It's got thrilling car chases, a drive-in movie vibe, choreographed musical scenes (yes. it does.), snappy dialogue, pedal to the medal pacing, lots of love for iPods, genuine on-screen chemistry between the leads, and a helluva soundtrack.  Plus Don Draper, Cinderella, Django, Shane from The Walking Dead, Flea, and Frank Underwood (*I mean Jon Hamm, Lily James, Jamie Foxx, Jon Bernthal, Flea, and Kevin Spacey).  Need I say more?  Go see it (in theaters). 

Spider-Man: Homecoming
  • Review: 5/5
  • Tom Holland is the definitive Spider-Man.  Of course, I had my doubts with this being the third attempt/reboot at the series in the last 15 years (hard to believe it's been that long since the original Tobey Maguire / Sam Raimi interpretation).  But they just nailed it.  Tom Holland plays the titular role to perfection capturing the essence of the character: cool, dorky, clumsy, funny, smart, and brave - just like the webslinger ought to be.  The supporting cast is also great.  Notably, Michael Keaton has had an interesting career path: Batman --> Birdman --> Vulture.  Homecoming also fits snugly into the ever-expanding Marvel canon (with little Easter Eggs sprinkled throughout) while existing in its own right as a stand-alone summer popcorn flick.  The inclusion of Iron Man and Captain America is done in a way that's very clever and works quite well.  Fortunately, we aren't made to sit through the superhero backstory once again (the whole spider bite, parent issues, Uncle Ben thing, etc) which we've already seen twice in the last two decades.  Rather, the film takes a different approach, getting viewers up-to-speed with Peter Parker's "home movie" (shot on his smart phone) which serves to set the stage for the action that's about to take place.  Very nice.  Spider-Man: Homecoming represents the best of Marvel and is hilarious, action-packed, full of heart, and entertaining from start to finish.  

It Comes at Night
  • Review: 5/5
  • Awesome.  It Comes at Night represents a particular brand of horror/suspense, arguing that what you imagine is often far worse than what you are shown on the screen.  The title's meaning is multifactorial, but most literally refers to the evening nightmares experienced by one of the film's main characters (a teenager).  Like the main characters, we are trapped within a relatively confined space throughout the 90-minute runtime.  The sense of claustrophobia, suspicion, doubt, fear, and mistrust is palpable.  Characters' motives are often left ambiguous, and the viewer is forced to decide who to trust.  It's compelling.  The film is a master class at avoiding the need to over-explain or over-load with dialogue while still conveying a sense of exposition and setting the scene.  We understand the dystopian nature of the film's world without being given all of the details, which works perfectly.  The ending will undoubtedly polarize viewers, particularly those who like all of their questions answered.  However, It Comes at Night quietly sneaks onto the film scene as a modern classic.

Wonder Woman
  • Review 4.5/5
  • Gal Gadot is perfect.  Love the retro vibe, the perfect chemistry between the leads, the optimism, the bravery, the comedy, the killer soundtrack (Wonder Woman soundtrack, click here!), and the awesome action sequences!  Wonder Woman represents a hero all viewers can aspire to be like, one who won't back down in the face of adversity but rather takes it on when others refuse to.  Note: I would've given it 5/5 if not for the opening voice-over narration (not a fan, you don't need it!).

Guardians of the Galaxy: Volume 2
  • Review: 4.5/5
  • I can't stop listening to the soundtrack.  Guardians 2 offers fans of the original more of the zany antics, hilarious dialogue, beautiful cinematography/CGI, and colorful cast that we've come to expect from the MCU.  It has an abundance of heart, laughs, action, and old school music.  A thoroughly enjoyable sequel from start to finish.

Alien: Covenant
  • Review: 4/5
  • The sequel to 2012's Prometheus succeeds for one reason: David (Michael Fassbender).  Once again, he nails the part of the tricky little humanoid throughout the film, and this time in a dual performance.  The film is worth seeing for his performance alone.  Director Ridley Scott appears once again drawn to the hefty themes he has explored in previous films: the nature of creation, man vs machine, the consequences of exploration, deception in space.  His direction is seasoned and confident, but the film is also wrought with horror cliches.  As what seems to be a direct response to the lack of the xenomorph in Prometheus, there is an abundance of the ever-evolving alien wreaking havoc on the humans throughout the film's runtime.  While Covenant falls short of classic status, it certainly delivers the thrills and represents another stellar performance from one of the modern day great actors.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales
  • Review: 3/5
  • Has a distinct "not as bad as the last one" but also "not as good as the first three" vibe.  Fortunately, most of the original cast are back to reprise their roles for the (?)farewell entry into the Pirates canon.  Newcomer Javier Bardem is a welcome addition and remains one of my favorite modern day actors.  There are a few really nice action sequences (pirate-zombie-sharks?  Yes.).  And I never get tired of Barbosa's classic laugh (click here for Barbosa!).  Overall, this Pirates film can tread water much better than the last entry but still can't compete with the original trilogy for sheer fun adventure at sea on the big screen.

The Mummy
  • Review: 2/5
  • Unfortunately, the reboot of The Mummy and start of Universal's "Dark Universe" (basically the upcoming rehash of classic movie monsters a-la The Avengers formula) isn't all that much fun.  There is a severe lack of chemistry between the leads and overall forgettable quality that permeates throughout its runtime.  Personally, I thoroughly enjoyed the Stephen Sommers Mummy movies from 1999 and 2001.  They were fun, exciting, iconic, quotable, and perfect summer action blockbuster adventure films.  The reboot can't quite decide what tone it wants: part-comedy (but not that funny), part-action (but not that exciting), part-horror (but not that scary). Another glaring problem with the reboot this year is that most of the film takes place outside of the desert.  Much of the action takes place in London, and it can't help but feel somewhat out of place (however, it was a nice touch to have windows exploding to create the sand throughout the streets).  The final act "twist" regarding one of the main characters will polarize viewers.  A disappointing start to what could be a promising series of interconnected films.
Image source: https://i0.wp.com/media2.slashfilm.com/slashfilm/wp/wp-content/images/baby-driver-poster.jpg

Saturday, April 22, 2017

Sequel Nation

After almost two years... the blog is back!

With the release of The Fate of the Furious marking the 8th Fast & Furious film in the franchise to date (and at least two more on the way),  I felt this was a nice opportunity to reflect on the popularity of the Hollywood sequel.

Since the 1980's, sequel films have consistently dominated the box office of their respective decades.

Below are the highest grossing films of the last several decades.  The films in BOLD are sequels.
  • Highest grossing films of the 1980's
    • E.T.
    • Star Wars: Return of the Jedi
    • Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back
    • Batman --> start of a franchise
    • Raiders of the Lost Ark --> start of a franchise
    • Ghostbusters --> start of a franchise
    • Beverly Hills Cop --> start of a franchise
    • Back to the Future --> start of a franchise
    • Indiana Jones & The Last Crusade
    • Indiana Jones & The Temple of Doom
  • Highest grossing films of the 1990's
    • Titanic
    • Star Wars: The Phantom Menace
    • Jurassic Park
    • The Lion King --> start of a franchise
    • Forrest Gump
    • Independence Day --> start of a franchise
    • The Sixth Sense
    • Home Alone --> start of a franchise
    • Men in Black --> start of a franchise
    • Toy Story 2
  • Highest grossing films of the 2000's
    • Avatar --> start of a franchise
    • LOTR: Return of the King
    • Pirates: Dead Man's Chest
    • The Dark Knight
    • Harry Potter: Sorcerer's Stone
    • Pirates: At World's End
    • Harry Potter: Order of the Phoenix
    • Harry Potter: Half-Blood Prince
    • LOTR: The Two Towers
    • Shrek 2
  • Highest grossing films of the 2010's
    • Star Wars: The Force Awakens
    • Jurassic World
    • The Avengers
    • Furious 7
    • Avengers: Age of Ultron
    • Harry Potter: Deathly Hallows Part 2
    • Frozen --> start of a franchise?
    • Iron Man 3
    • Minions
    • Captain America: Civil War
Clearly, the American film-going audience has shelled out several billions of dollars to see cinematic sequels over the past 30+ years.  It should come as no surprise that the folks in Hollywood continue to churn out more every year.  With summer fast approaching, we can expect the same this year.  

Granted, many of the franchises above consistently generate solid & thoroughly entertaining films.   The Harry Potter and Star Wars series have both deviated from the original canon films & created prequel franchises in recent years (i.e. Fantastic Beasts & Where to Find Them, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story).  There seems no foreseeable end in sight to the possible storylines which could be created in these vast cinematic landscapes.  

Another recent trend has been the blurring of the lines between film & television.  The most clear example is the Marvel Cinematic Universe in which characters cross between the big & little screen interchangeably.  This seems to be much more commonplace than in years past.

Series which have entries in both film & television:
  • Marvel Cinematic Universe
  • Fargo
  • Lethal Weapon
  • Sherlock Holmes (various iterations)
  • Mission Impossible
  • 21 Jump Street
  • Chips
  • Scream
So why do we pay so much to see these sequels?  For the most part, they are fun.  Sequels broadly fall into one of two main categories: action/adventure & comedy.  There are, of course, exceptions, but the vast majority either take the viewer on a thrill ride of heightened reality or through an hour & a half of laughs.  Another reason is familiarity - we've seen the characters before and are already attached or invested in them in some capacity, whether it be from a previous film, book, or TV series.  The audience for many of these films is international, and the franchises are all across the globe. 

I've never been one to suggest that just because something is popular or mainstream that means that it's bad.  Many of the above films & franchises are some of my favorites, and they are ones that I've watched time & time again.  But when you notice that every other movie showtime over the next few months is a sequel/prequel/reboot/re-imagining/big-screen-adaptation, make no mistake - it's nothing new.

And just in case you're wondering, I haven't seen The Fate of the Furious... yet.


I previously wrote on this topic: here.

Image source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/2d/The_Fate_of_The_Furious_Theatrical_Poster.jpg/220px-The_Fate_of_The_Furious_Theatrical_Poster.jpgFilm grossing stats: www.filmsite.org/boxoffice2.html